Written below are the most common arguments people use against Communism, and my responses to them. The problem with this commonly used argument is that more or less everything has been tried and failed. Take democracy for example. Can I argue that democracy is a futile endeavor because it failed not once but multiple times it was tried?
The theory and method of study developed by Marxtermed historical materialismrecognizes the ways in which economic systems structure society as a whole and influence everyday life and experience.
The base structure prescribes a range of systems and institutions aimed to advance the interests of those in power, often facilitated through the exploitation of the working class. Marx argues that these systems are set by the ruling class in accordance with their need to maintain or increase class conflict in order to remain in power.
However, Marx also acknowledges the potential for organization and collective action by the lower classes with the goal of empowering a new ruling class.
As Vladimir Lenin argues in support of this possibility, the organization of socialist consciousness by a vanguard party is vital to the working class revolutionary process. In a private ownership system, individuals who do not own land or other means of production are in a situation that Engels compares to enslavement - they must work for the owners of the land in order to be able to live within the system of private ownership.
Engels explains that the transition to this type of system resulted in the creation of separate public and private spheres and assigned access to waged labor disproportionately to men. Through a Marxist historical perspective, Engels analyzes the widespread social phenomena associated with female sexual morality, such as fixation on virginity and sexual purity, incrimination and violent punishment of women who commit adulteryand demands that women be submissive to their husbands.
Ultimately, Engels traces these phenomena to the recent development of exclusive control of private property by the patriarchs of the rising slaveowner class in the ancient mode of production, and the attendant desire to ensure that their inheritance is passed only to their own offspring: As such, gender oppression is closely related to class oppression and the relationship between men and women in society is similar to the relations between proletariat and bourgeoisie.
Productive and reproductive labour[ edit ] In the capitalist system, two types of labor exista division stressed by Marxist feminists like Margaret Benston and Peggy Morton.
For An Independent and Socialist Canada: A Marxist-Leninist View. Chapter 4: Program for Struggle To say that we want socialism in Canada does not constitute a program, it merely states what our final purpose is. How we propose to attain this purpose is what constitutes a program, and our program must be based on an understanding of the. Would the USA benefit from socialism? 62% Say Yes 38% Say No Yes to end poverty The argument that socialism kills the drive to Excell at work is B.S. What it does do however is make it where you don't have to to way up the food chain to make it. Socialists are not in favor of a dictatorial government. Unless you come across . An Argument For Marxist Socialism In CanadaMarxist Socialism is the ideal form of government in Canada. Through this egalitarian way of governing, Canadians could solve virtually all the problems plaguing our society today. Using Marx's theory we could /5(2).
The second form of labor is reproductive, which is associated with the private sphere and involves anything that people have to do for themselves that is not for the purposes of receiving a wage i. Both forms of labor are necessary, but people have different access to these forms of labor based on certain aspects of their identity.
Women are assigned to the domestic sphere where the labor is reproductive and thus uncompensated and unrecognized in a capitalist system. It is in the best interest of both public and private institutions to exploit the labor of women as an inexpensive method of supporting a work force.
For the producers, this means higher profits. For the nuclear family, the power dynamic dictates that domestic work is exclusively to be completed by the woman of the household thus liberating the rest of the members from their own necessary reproductive labor. Marxist feminists argue that the exclusion of women from productive labor leads to male control in both private and public domains.
Though their controversial advocacy often receives criticism, Marxist feminists challenge capitalism in ways that facilitate new discourse and shed light on the status of women. Many of these women, including Selma James Mariarosa Dalla Costa,  Brigitte Galtier, and Silvia Federici  published a range of sources to promote their message in academic and public domains.
Despite the efforts beginning with a relatively small group of women in Italy, The Wages for Housework Campaign was successful in mobilizing on an international level.
In her critique of traditional Marxist feminist movements such as the Wages for Housework Campaign, Heidi Hartmann argues that these efforts "take as their question the relationship of women to the economic system, rather than that of women to men, apparently assuming the latter will be explained in their discussion of the former.
Similarly, Gayle Rubinwho has written on a range of subjects including sadomasochism, prostitution, pornography, and lesbian literature as well as anthropological studies and histories of sexual subcultures, first rose to prominence through her essay The Traffic in Women: More recently, many Marxist feminists have shifted their focus to the ways in which women are now potentially in worse conditions after gaining access to productive labour.
They contend that elimination of the capitalist profit-driven economy will remove the motivation for sexism, racism, homophobia, and other forms of oppression.Barber’s argument against Marxism echoes two lines of criticism that he notes were used during the Cold War to “hit back at the Marxist foe.” The first response was that “Whatever the theory, the practice stank.
Towards A Marxist Polemic Against Democratic Socialism (alphabetnyc.comism) The issue with this argument is the belief that socialism is mere state control or a strong welfare state and the idea that socialism and capitalism can co-exist. Conservatives in Canada don't argue with liberals about single-payer healthcare; it's a settled issue.
My opponent claims that based on this marginal statistic, the majority of Americans want a change to Capitalism. However my opponent's other statistic which says that 53% of Americans favor Capitalism over Socialism leads us to the exact opposite conclusion that my opponent makes.
Would the USA benefit from socialism? 62% Say Yes 38% Say No Yes to end poverty The argument that socialism kills the drive to Excell at work is B.S. What it does do however is make it where you don't have to to way up the food chain to make it.
Socialists are not in favor of a dictatorial government. Unless you come across . The central arguments in the socialism vs. capitalism debate are about economic equality and the role of government. Socialists believe economic inequality is bad for society, and the government is responsible for reducing it via programs that benefit the poor (e.g., free public education, free or subsidized healthcare, social security for the elderly, higher taxes on the rich).
Don’t get me wrong, I’m a Marxist communist, but Americans today want to know why socialism will work, and a more brief explanation of the ultimate communist society will suffice to clear the bad rap communism’s been getting over the last century.
The video was nice though.